Case Command Center
Branching, position-aware, evidence-first legal workflow. The application separates forum, cause of action, proof, procedure and defense instead of treating every dispute as one generic case.
7
respondent classes
12
document workflows
4
Tagapagbantay audit tiers
Scope Lock
Barangay officials and employees; municipal elective officials; municipal appointive personnel; private suppliers/contractors only when a legally supported conspiracy theory exists. No national/military/Sandiganbayan enterprise expansion.
Hard Safety Rule
The system never invents a fact, service, signature, oath, amount, conspiracy, custody, or evidence. If proof is missing, the case is flagged as vulnerable and the user is directed to cure it lawfully.
1. Comprehensive Case Intake
Former Treasurer Control Branch
Roadmap & Risk
Enter facts to build the procedural branch.
3. Retrospective Timeline & Cure
Historical events are assessed for service, answer periods, authority, attachments and finality. The system never backdates a cure.
Findings
4. Cause & Evidence Quantum
Evidence Matrix
5. Pleadings & Communications
Draft
No draft.
7. TAGAPAGBANTAY 2.0
Position-specific adversarial audit of incoming pleadings and our own drafts. Auto-correction is constrained: it can repair structure and language, but cannot manufacture proof.
Defect & Vulnerability Report
Airtight Corrected Version
6. Defensive Shield
Protective Steps
Legal Controls
The application is deliberately source-controlled. A “complete” case library means branching across the bounded legal universe, not pretending the browser contains every Philippine statute.
| Authority | Control in app |
|---|---|
| RA 7160 §§60–63 | Elective-local grounds, filing forums, verified answer/investigation sequence, preventive suspension and election-period restriction. |
| RA 7160 §§389, 394–395 | Barangay executive/secretary/treasurer functions; authority must be verified before discipline or turnover action. |
| 2025 RACCS | Appointive personnel administrative procedure; formal charge/supporting documents, answer and procedural safeguards. |
| RA 6770 §24 | Ombudsman preventive-suspension gate; application is a request for lawful action, not an order generated by the app. |
| RA 3019 §§3(e),(g) | Element matrix and conspiracy/nexus gate; procurement irregularity alone is not treated as automatic graft. |
| RPC Arts. 216, 217, 221, 222 | Accountable-officer and delivery/accountability theories; status, custody and act must be supported. |
| COA Circular 2019-001 | Barangay financial transaction submission/control workflow and audit escalation indicators. |
For actual filing, the responsible lawyer/authorized official must verify the current text, forum, filing rules, service requirements and facts. The app is a decision-support and drafting system, not the adjudicator.